Institution record
StoneX One
StoneX Financial Inc.
- Source score
- 5.0
- Source exposures
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) | CRD 136795 / SEC 8-68179 | Regulated | StoneX Financial Inc. | 2015 | |
Financial Conduct Authority | 446717 | Regulated | StoneX Financial Ltd | 2010 | |
National Futures Association | 0501390 | Regulated | StoneX Financial Inc. | 2015 | |
Monetary Authority of Singapore | Not supplied | Regulated | StoneX Financial Pte. Ltd. | 2011 | |
Australian Securities and Investments Commission | 345646 | Regulated | City Index Australia Pty Ltd | 2014 |
Peer source record comparison
Compare imported fields for StoneX One and other records in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers dataset. These are not independent audit findings.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Source exposures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| StoneX One (this record) | U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)Financial Conduct AuthorityNFA+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
SCBIIROCU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)+1 | 3 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
IIROCFinancial Conduct AuthorityASIC+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | 8.0 | 0 | |
Financial Conduct AuthorityCYSECMFSA | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 | |
Financial Conduct Authority | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 | |
MAS | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 2.0 | 0 |
StoneX One: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is StoneX One's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
The imported dataset contains 5 licence entries associated with StoneX One (legal entity reference: StoneX Financial Inc.); 5 are labelled "regulated" and 5 are labelled regulated or registered: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) — licence CRD 136795 / SEC 8-68179, status: regulated; Financial Conduct Authority — licence 446717, status: regulated; NFA (National Futures Association) — licence 0501390, status: regulated; MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 345646, status: regulated. These fields are not independent confirmation of current authorisation. Check the exact contracting entity and registration number on the official U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Financial Conduct Authority, NFA public register.
Which of StoneX One's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
No matching licence records were found in this site's stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers source selection. The dataset may be incomplete; check the relevant official registers before drawing conclusions about authorisation or jurisdiction.
What is StoneX One's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
StoneX One carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 5.0, risk & licensing: 5.0, brand: 5.0, market influence: 5.0, user reputation: 0.0). The imported source lists 0 exposure entries. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to StoneX One's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with StoneX One, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (stonex.co) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 source exposure entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).