1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
ITigerUp vs Prospero Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of ITigerUp (TigerBrokers) and Prospero Markets (Prospero Markets) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers
- ITigerUp 6D Score
- 2.0
- Prospero Markets 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
ITigerUp and Prospero Markets are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, ITigerUp holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Prospero Markets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | ITigerUp | Prospero Markets | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | ITigerUp |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Prospero Markets |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.0 | ITigerUp |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: ITigerUp vs Prospero Markets
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | ITigerUp | Prospero Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | TigerBrokers | Prospero Markets |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1/F, 308 Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong | AU |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Indices, Stocks, Futures, Options | Commodities, Currency pairs, Stock indices, Stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare ITigerUp and Prospero Markets against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: ITigerUp vs Prospero Markets
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: ITigerUp or Prospero Markets?
Both ITigerUp and Prospero Markets hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, ITigerUp maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Prospero Markets maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between ITigerUp and Prospero Markets?
In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), ITigerUp records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Prospero Markets at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do ITigerUp and Prospero Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
ITigerUp lists Indices, Stocks, Futures, Options with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Prospero Markets lists Commodities, Currency pairs, Stock indices, Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: ITigerUp or Prospero Markets?
ITigerUp carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Prospero Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.