Institution record
ITigerUp
TigerBrokers
- Source score
- 2.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In our coverage Australian Securities and Investments Commission | 505213 | Cancelled | TIGER BROKERS (NZ) LIMITED | 2019-05-02 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing ITigerUp against peer institutions in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITigerUp (this record) | ASIC | 0 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 2.0 | 0 |
IIROCFinancial Conduct AuthorityASIC+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | 8.0 | 0 | |
SCBIIROCU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)+1 | 3 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Conduct AuthorityCYSECMFSA | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 | |
SFCSFC | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 | |
SFCSFC | 1 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
ITigerUp: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is ITigerUp's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, ITigerUp (legal entity reference: TigerBrokers) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 0 carry a "regulated" status and 0 are marked regulated or registered: ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 505213, status: cancelled. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official ASIC public register.
Which of ITigerUp's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
This directory focuses on stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers. 1 of ITigerUp's 1 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: ASIC (licence 505213, cancelled, entity: TIGER BROKERS (NZ) LIMITED). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.
What is ITigerUp's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
ITigerUp carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 2.0, risk & licensing: 2.0, brand: 2.0, market influence: 2.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to ITigerUp's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with ITigerUp, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (tigerbrokers.nz) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to ASIC.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from ETFYield Lab relevant to ITigerUp's supervisory scope.
TIPS & Inflation Breakevens
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) vs. Direct T-Bill Tax Math: 30-Day SEC Yield vs. Trailing 12-Month Distribution Yield Audit (4.32% Implied Box Spread Rate Benchmark)
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) vs. Direct T-Bill Tax Math (BOXX-SYNTHETIC-BOX) stands at 4.32% (Implied Box Spread Rate) (Source: Cboe SPX Box Options / IRS Sec 1256, 2026-10-20), governing Form N-1A Item 26 ac
ETF Fee Drag & SEC Yield Audits
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) vs. Direct T-Bill Tax Math: 10-Year Expense Ratio Fee Drag & Compounding Simulation ($100k) (4.32% Implied Box Spread Rate Benchmark)
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) vs. Direct T-Bill Tax Math (BOXX-SYNTHETIC-BOX) stands at 4.32% (Implied Box Spread Rate) (Source: Cboe SPX Box Options / IRS Sec 1256, 2026-10-20), governing basis-point fee diff
Corporate & Municipal Bond ETFs
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) vs. Direct T-Bill Tax Math: Modified Duration, DV01 & +/-100 bps Parallel Yield Shock Table (4.32% Implied Box Spread Rate Benchmark)
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) vs. Direct T-Bill Tax Math (BOXX-SYNTHETIC-BOX) stands at 4.32% (Implied Box Spread Rate) (Source: Cboe SPX Box Options / IRS Sec 1256, 2026-10-20), governing second-order Taylor
Treasury Ladders & Yield Math
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) vs. Direct T-Bill Tax Math: State Income Tax Exemption & After-Tax Yield Equivalence Matrix (4.32% Implied Box Spread Rate Benchmark)
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) vs. Direct T-Bill Tax Math (BOXX-SYNTHETIC-BOX) stands at 4.32% (Implied Box Spread Rate) (Source: Cboe SPX Box Options / IRS Sec 1256, 2026-10-20), governing U.S. government obli