Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Interactive Investor vs Parity Wallet: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Interactive Investor (Interactive Investor Services Limited) and Parity Wallet (Parity Wallet) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

Interactive Investor 6D Score
5.0
Parity Wallet 6D Score
3.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: interactive-investor-vs-parity-wallet

Interactive Investor outranks Parity Wallet by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 3.0)

On supervisory breadth, Interactive Investor holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Parity Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightInteractive InvestorParity WalletScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.03.0+2.0Interactive Investor
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.03.0+2.0Interactive Investor
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.02.0+1.0Interactive Investor
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight4.03.0+1.0Interactive Investor
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.03.0+2.0Interactive Investor

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Interactive Investor vs Parity Wallet

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Interactive Investor vs Parity Wallet
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Interactive Investor and Parity Wallet.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeInteractive InvestorParity Wallet
Primary Legal NameInteractive Investor Services LimitedParity Wallet
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / Address201 Deansgate Manchester M3 3NWM 3 3 N W UNITED KINGDOMGB
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocks, Funds, Trusts and ETFsAsset management, Transfers
Execution Software & Terminalsinteractive investor (ii)Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Interactive Investor and Parity Wallet against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Interactive Investor vs Parity Wallet

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Interactive Investor or Parity Wallet?

Both Interactive Investor and Parity Wallet hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Interactive Investor maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Parity Wallet maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Interactive Investor and Parity Wallet?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Interactive Investor records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Parity Wallet at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do Interactive Investor and Parity Wallet differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Interactive Investor lists Stocks, Funds, Trusts and ETFs with execution software [interactive investor (ii)], while Parity Wallet lists Asset management, Transfers with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Interactive Investor or Parity Wallet?

Interactive Investor carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Parity Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Interactive Investor vs Parity Wallet (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab