1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FUTU vs Interactive Investor: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) and Interactive Investor (Interactive Investor Services Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers
- FUTU 6D Score
- 7.7
- Interactive Investor 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FUTU outranks Interactive Investor by +2.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Interactive Investor holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FUTU | Interactive Investor | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.7 | 5.0 | +2.7 | FUTU |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.7 | 5.0 | +2.7 | FUTU |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | FUTU |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.5 | 4.0 | +3.5 | FUTU |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.9 | 5.0 | +2.9 | FUTU |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUTU vs Interactive Investor
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FUTU | Interactive Investor |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Futu Holding Limited | Interactive Investor Services Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | G/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE). | 201 Deansgate Manchester M3 3NWM 3 3 N W UNITED KINGDOM |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks | Stocks, Funds, Trusts and ETFs |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | interactive investor (ii) |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FUTU and Interactive Investor against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FUTU vs Interactive Investor
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUTU or Interactive Investor?
FUTU holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, FUTU maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Interactive Investor maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUTU and Interactive Investor?
In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUTU records an Overall Score of 7.7 (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with Interactive Investor at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do FUTU and Interactive Investor differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Interactive Investor lists Stocks, Funds, Trusts and ETFs with execution software [interactive investor (ii)]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUTU or Interactive Investor?
FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Interactive Investor carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.