1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Futu Securities vs Livermore: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Futu Securities (Futu Securities International (Hong Kong) Limited) and Livermore (Livermore) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers
- Futu Securities 6D Score
- 2.0
- Livermore 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Livermore outranks Futu Securities by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Futu Securities holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Livermore holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Futu Securities | Livermore | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 | Livermore |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 | Livermore |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 | Livermore |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 | Livermore |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 | Livermore |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Futu Securities vs Livermore
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Futu Securities | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Futu Securities International (Hong Kong) Limited | Livermore |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Unit C1-2, 13F, United Centre, No. 95 Queensway, Admiralty, HK | Room 1214A, 12/F, Tower 2, Cheung Sha Wan Plaza, 833 Cheung Sha Wan Road, Kowloon, China |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks, ETFs and Warrants, Options, Futures, Funds and Other Service Fees | Stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Futu Securities and Livermore against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Futu Securities vs Livermore
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Futu Securities or Livermore?
Livermore holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Futu Securities maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Livermore maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Futu Securities and Livermore?
In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Futu Securities records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Livermore at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Futu Securities and Livermore differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Futu Securities lists Stocks, ETFs and Warrants, Options, Futures, Funds and Other Service Fees with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Livermore lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Futu Securities or Livermore?
Futu Securities carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Livermore carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.