1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Fidelity vs Haitong International: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fidelity (Fidelity) and Haitong International (Haitong International Securities Group Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers
- Fidelity 6D Score
- 7.0
- Haitong International 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Fidelity outranks Haitong International by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Fidelity holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Haitong International holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Fidelity | Haitong International | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | Fidelity |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 8.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | Fidelity |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | Fidelity |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | Fidelity |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fidelity vs Haitong International
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Fidelity | Haitong International |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Fidelity | Haitong International Securities Group Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 7-7-7 Roppongi, Minato City, Tokyo, Japan | Hong Kong Des Voeux Road Central 189 Lee Boon Choon Building 22/F |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks | Asset management, corporate finance |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Fidelity and Haitong International against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Fidelity vs Haitong International
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fidelity or Haitong International?
Both Fidelity and Haitong International hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Fidelity maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FINRA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Haitong International maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fidelity and Haitong International?
In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fidelity records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 8.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with Haitong International at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).
How do Fidelity and Haitong International differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Fidelity lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Haitong International lists Asset management, corporate finance with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fidelity or Haitong International?
Fidelity carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Haitong International carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.