Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Fidelity International vs Interactive Investor: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Fidelity International (Fidelity International) and Interactive Investor (Interactive Investor Services Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

Fidelity International 6D Score
5.0
Interactive Investor 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fidelity-international-vs-interactive-investor

Fidelity International and Interactive Investor are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Fidelity International holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Interactive Investor holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFidelity InternationalInteractive InvestorScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.04.0+1.0Fidelity International
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Fidelity International vs Interactive Investor

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Fidelity International vs Interactive Investor
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Fidelity International and Interactive Investor.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFidelity InternationalInteractive Investor
Primary Legal NameFidelity InternationalInteractive Investor Services Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressBeech Gate, Millfield Lane, Lower Kingswood, Tadworth, Surrey, KT20 6RP。201 Deansgate Manchester M3 3NWM 3 3 N W UNITED KINGDOM
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesWealth management, Stocks, FundsStocks, Funds, Trusts and ETFs
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web Platforminteractive investor (ii)
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Fidelity International and Interactive Investor against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Fidelity International vs Interactive Investor

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Fidelity International or Interactive Investor?

Fidelity International holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Fidelity International maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Interactive Investor maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Fidelity International and Interactive Investor?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Fidelity International records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Interactive Investor at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Fidelity International and Interactive Investor differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Fidelity International lists Wealth management, Stocks, Funds with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Interactive Investor lists Stocks, Funds, Trusts and ETFs with execution software [interactive investor (ii)]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Fidelity International or Interactive Investor?

Fidelity International carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Interactive Investor carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Fidelity International vs Interactive Investor (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab