1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FAIR MARKETS vs ITigerUp: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FAIR MARKETS (FairMarkets Trading Pty Ltd) and ITigerUp (TigerBrokers) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers
- FAIR MARKETS 6D Score
- 6.0
- ITigerUp 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FAIR MARKETS outranks ITigerUp by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, FAIR MARKETS holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas ITigerUp holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FAIR MARKETS | ITigerUp | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 2.0 | +4.0 | FAIR MARKETS |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.0 | 2.0 | +2.0 | FAIR MARKETS |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | FAIR MARKETS |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | FAIR MARKETS |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 2.0 | +4.0 | FAIR MARKETS |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FAIR MARKETS vs ITigerUp
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FAIR MARKETS | ITigerUp |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FairMarkets Trading Pty Ltd | TigerBrokers |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Level 26, 1 Bligh St, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia The Cyberati Lounge, Ground Floor, Silicon Avenue 40 Cybercity, 72201 Ebene Republic of Mauritius | 1/F, 308 Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | products, stocks, FX, commodities, oil trading, silver trading, index CFDs | Indices, Stocks, Futures, Options |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Tagalog, Vietnamese, Thai, Hindi | Chinese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FAIR MARKETS and ITigerUp against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FAIR MARKETS vs ITigerUp
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FAIR MARKETS or ITigerUp?
FAIR MARKETS holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, FAIR MARKETS maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas ITigerUp maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FAIR MARKETS and ITigerUp?
In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FAIR MARKETS records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with ITigerUp at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do FAIR MARKETS and ITigerUp differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FAIR MARKETS lists products, stocks, FX, commodities, oil trading, silver trading, index CFDs with execution software [MT4, MT5], while ITigerUp lists Indices, Stocks, Futures, Options with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FAIR MARKETS or ITigerUp?
FAIR MARKETS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while ITigerUp carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.