1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Blockchain Wallet vs Hem Securities: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Blockchain Wallet (Blockchain (LT), UAB) and Hem Securities (Hem Securities Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers
- Blockchain Wallet 6D Score
- 3.6
- Hem Securities 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Hem Securities outranks Blockchain Wallet by +2.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 3.6)
On supervisory breadth, Blockchain Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Hem Securities holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Blockchain Wallet | Hem Securities | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.6 | 6.0 | +2.4 | Hem Securities |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.6 | 6.0 | +2.4 | Hem Securities |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 4.0 | +2.0 | Hem Securities |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.7 | 6.0 | +2.3 | Hem Securities |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.7 | 6.0 | +2.3 | Hem Securities |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Blockchain Wallet vs Hem Securities
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Blockchain Wallet | Hem Securities |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Blockchain (LT), UAB | Hem Securities Ltd. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Upės str. 23, Vilnius, Lithuania | 203, Jaipur Tower, M.I. Road, Jaipur - 302001 904, A wing, Naman Midtown, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone road, Mumbai 400 013. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Asset management, Transfers | Stocks, derivatives, commodities, currencies, new share subscriptions, mutual funds, portfolio management |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Spanish, Portuguese, English, Russian | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Blockchain Wallet and Hem Securities against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Blockchain Wallet vs Hem Securities
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Blockchain Wallet or Hem Securities?
Hem Securities holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Blockchain Wallet maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Hem Securities maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SEBI) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Blockchain Wallet and Hem Securities?
In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Blockchain Wallet records an Overall Score of 3.6 (Risk & Licensing: 3.6, Brand: 3.7, Market Influence: 3.7, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Hem Securities at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Blockchain Wallet and Hem Securities differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Blockchain Wallet lists Asset management, Transfers with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Hem Securities lists Stocks, derivatives, commodities, currencies, new share subscriptions, mutual funds, portfolio management with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Blockchain Wallet or Hem Securities?
Blockchain Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Hem Securities carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.