Institution record
Blockchain Wallet
Blockchain (LT), UAB
- Source score
- 3.6
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
No licence records on file for this institution.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Blockchain Wallet against peer institutions in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blockchain Wallet (this record) | None on file | 0 / 0 | Risk level not supplied | 3.6 | 0 |
SCBIIROCU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)+1 | 3 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
IIROCFinancial Conduct AuthorityASIC+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | 8.0 | 0 | |
Financial Conduct AuthorityCYSECMFSA | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 | |
SFCSFC | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 | |
SFCSFC | 1 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
Blockchain Wallet: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Blockchain Wallet's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
Our imported dataset currently holds 0 verified regulatory licence records for Blockchain Wallet (Blockchain (LT), UAB), registered at Upės str. 23, Vilnius, Lithuania and tracked under our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers scope. Prospective counterparties should request primary registration certificates and cross-check the contracting entity directly on the relevant national financial supervisor's public register before onboarding.
Which of Blockchain Wallet's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Blockchain Wallet is registered at Upės str. 23, Vilnius, Lithuania and tracked under our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers scope based on its institutional service profile (Asset management, Transfers) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 0 recorded licences (none on file) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Blockchain Wallet's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Blockchain Wallet carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 3.6, risk & licensing: 3.6, brand: 3.7, market influence: 3.7, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Blockchain Wallet's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Blockchain Wallet, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to the supervising authority.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from ETFYield Lab relevant to Blockchain Wallet's supervisory scope.
regulatory-compliance
US Treasury cuts off MEXC over alleged $16B in illicit transactions
US Treasury cuts off MEXC over alleged in illicit transactions: The US Treasury bureau FinCEN on Friday ordered US financial institutions to stop processing transfers involving MEXC Global. ## Supervisory Register
Fixed Income ETFs & Market Microstructure
SEC Rule 6c-11 Custom Creation Baskets, Fixed-Income ETF NAV Arbitrage & After-Tax Yield Drag Model (2026)
Authorized Participant (AP) custom creation and redemption baskets under SEC Rule 6c-11 refer to non-pro-rata fixed-income portfolio transfers that allow ETF issuers to purge low-basis, illiquid, or off-the-run bonds in-kind without realizing distributable capital gains, compressing annualized after-tax yield drag by 42 to 118 basis points compared with open-end mutual funds.
cryptocurrency-markets
Strive buys 15,124 Bitcoin in October, closes in on top treasury holders
Strive buys 15,124 Bitcoin in October, closes in on top treasury holders: Institutional summary of the primary material ($509). Cross-reference official supervisory registers for live updates.
earnings-reports
Avalanche Treasury reports preliminary Q3 results
Avalanche Treasury reports preliminary Q3 results: Avalanche Treasury reports preliminary Q3 results ## Supervisory Register Cross-Reference & Licensing Context Cross-verify active authorisation, appro