Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

shareDeal active vs Trcryptomasters: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of shareDeal active (shareDeal active) and Trcryptomasters (Trcryptomasters) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

shareDeal active 6D Score
5.0
Trcryptomasters 6D Score
1.2
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: sharedeal-active-vs-trcryptomasters

shareDeal active outranks Trcryptomasters by +3.8 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.2)

On supervisory breadth, shareDeal active holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Trcryptomasters holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightshareDeal activeTrcryptomastersScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.01.2+3.8shareDeal active
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.01.2+3.8shareDeal active
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.01.0+2.0shareDeal active
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.01.2+3.8shareDeal active
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.01.2+3.8shareDeal active

Visual Architecture Benchmark: shareDeal active vs Trcryptomasters

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: shareDeal active vs Trcryptomasters
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between shareDeal active and Trcryptomasters.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeshareDeal activeTrcryptomasters
Primary Legal NameshareDeal activeTrcryptomasters
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on fileNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressshareDeal active Jarvis Investment Management Ltd 78 Mount Ephraim Royal Tunbridge Wells Kent TN4 8BS51 Lime St, London EC3M 7DQ, UK
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocks, Bonds and ETFsStocks, Currencies and Cryptocurrencies
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare shareDeal active and Trcryptomasters against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: shareDeal active vs Trcryptomasters

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: shareDeal active or Trcryptomasters?

Both shareDeal active and Trcryptomasters hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, shareDeal active maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Trcryptomasters maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between shareDeal active and Trcryptomasters?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), shareDeal active records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Trcryptomasters at 1.2 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.2, Brand: 1.2, Market Influence: 1.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do shareDeal active and Trcryptomasters differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

shareDeal active lists Stocks, Bonds and ETFs with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Trcryptomasters lists Stocks, Currencies and Cryptocurrencies with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: shareDeal active or Trcryptomasters?

shareDeal active carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Trcryptomasters carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

shareDeal active vs Trcryptomasters (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab