1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Livermore vs WILSON SECURITIES: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Livermore (Livermore) and WILSON SECURITIES (WILSON SECURITIES LIMITED) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers
- Livermore 6D Score
- 6.0
- WILSON SECURITIES 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Livermore outranks WILSON SECURITIES by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Livermore holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas WILSON SECURITIES holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Livermore | WILSON SECURITIES | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Livermore |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Livermore |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | Livermore |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Livermore |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Livermore |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Livermore vs WILSON SECURITIES
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Livermore | WILSON SECURITIES |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Livermore | WILSON SECURITIES LIMITED |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Room 1214A, 12/F, Tower 2, Cheung Sha Wan Plaza, 833 Cheung Sha Wan Road, Kowloon, China | Hong Kong Kowloon Tsim Sha Tsui East Mody Road 67 Peninsula Centre 11/F Room 19 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks | Stocks, Futures, Securities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Livermore and WILSON SECURITIES against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Livermore vs WILSON SECURITIES
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Livermore or WILSON SECURITIES?
Both Livermore and WILSON SECURITIES hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Livermore maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas WILSON SECURITIES maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Livermore and WILSON SECURITIES?
In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Livermore records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with WILSON SECURITIES at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Livermore and WILSON SECURITIES differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Livermore lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while WILSON SECURITIES lists Stocks, Futures, Securities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Livermore or WILSON SECURITIES?
Livermore carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while WILSON SECURITIES carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.