Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

IB vs Swissquote: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IB (Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Limited) and Swissquote (Swissquote Asia Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

IB 6D Score
8.0
Swissquote 6D Score
6.5
Regulated Licences
5 vs 5
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: ib-vs-swissquote

IB outranks Swissquote by +1.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (8.0 vs 6.5)

On supervisory breadth, IB holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Swissquote holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 6 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightIBSwissquoteScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite8.06.5+1.5IB
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight8.06.5+1.5IB
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight6.03.0+3.0IB
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight8.06.5+1.5IB
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight8.06.5+1.5IB

Visual Architecture Benchmark: IB vs Swissquote

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: IB vs Swissquote
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between IB and Swissquote.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeIBSwissquote
Primary Legal NameInteractive Brokers Hong Kong LimitedSwissquote Asia Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)5 regulated / 6 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressOne Pickwick Plaza, Greenwich, CT 06830 USASuites 3202-4, Level 32/F ICBC Tower 3 Garden Road Central, Hong Kong
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocks, options, futures, currencies, securities, etc.Currencies, stocks, indices, securities, precious metals, cryptocurrencies, news and information, robo-advisory, custody services, education
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Portuguese, EnglishOther regional languages, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Italian, English, French, German
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare IB and Swissquote against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: IB vs Swissquote

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IB or Swissquote?

Both IB and Swissquote hold 5 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, IB maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, ASIC, MAS) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Swissquote maintains 6 recorded filing(s) (FINMA, SFC, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IB and Swissquote?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IB records an Overall Score of 8.0 (Risk & Licensing: 8.0, Brand: 8.0, Market Influence: 8.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 6.0), compared with Swissquote at 6.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.5, Brand: 6.5, Market Influence: 6.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do IB and Swissquote differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

IB lists Stocks, options, futures, currencies, securities, etc. with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Swissquote lists Currencies, stocks, indices, securities, precious metals, cryptocurrencies, news and information, robo-advisory, custody services, education with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IB or Swissquote?

IB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Swissquote carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

IB vs Swissquote (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab