Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FUTU vs Swissquote: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) and Swissquote (Swissquote Asia Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

FUTU 6D Score
7.7
Swissquote 6D Score
6.5
Regulated Licences
1 vs 5
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: futu-vs-swissquote

FUTU outranks Swissquote by +1.2 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 6.5)

On supervisory breadth, FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Swissquote holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 6 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFUTUSwissquoteScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.76.5+1.2FUTU
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.76.5+1.2FUTU
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.03.0+2.0FUTU
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.56.5+1.0FUTU
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.96.5+1.4FUTU

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUTU vs Swissquote

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FUTU vs Swissquote
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FUTU and Swissquote.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFUTUSwissquote
Primary Legal NameFutu Holding LimitedSwissquote Asia Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)5 regulated / 6 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressG/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE).Suites 3202-4, Level 32/F ICBC Tower 3 Garden Road Central, Hong Kong
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocksCurrencies, stocks, indices, securities, precious metals, cryptocurrencies, news and information, robo-advisory, custody services, education
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishOther regional languages, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Italian, English, French, German
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FUTU and Swissquote against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FUTU vs Swissquote

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUTU or Swissquote?

Swissquote holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 1). Specifically, FUTU maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Swissquote maintains 6 recorded filing(s) (FINMA, SFC, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUTU and Swissquote?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUTU records an Overall Score of 7.7 (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with Swissquote at 6.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.5, Brand: 6.5, Market Influence: 6.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do FUTU and Swissquote differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Swissquote lists Currencies, stocks, indices, securities, precious metals, cryptocurrencies, news and information, robo-advisory, custody services, education with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUTU or Swissquote?

FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Swissquote carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FUTU vs Swissquote (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab