Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

IB vs SwissDirekt: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IB (Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Limited) and SwissDirekt (SwissDirect AG) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

IB 6D Score
8.0
SwissDirekt 6D Score
1.5
Regulated Licences
5 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: ib-vs-swissdirekt

IB outranks SwissDirekt by +6.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (8.0 vs 1.5)

On supervisory breadth, IB holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SwissDirekt holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightIBSwissDirektScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite8.01.5+6.5IB
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight8.01.5+6.5IB
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight6.01.0+5.0IB
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight8.01.5+6.5IB
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight8.01.5+6.5IB

Visual Architecture Benchmark: IB vs SwissDirekt

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: IB vs SwissDirekt
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between IB and SwissDirekt.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeIBSwissDirekt
Primary Legal NameInteractive Brokers Hong Kong LimitedSwissDirect AG
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressOne Pickwick Plaza, Greenwich, CT 06830 USAIndustriestrasse 13A CH-6300 Zug
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocks, options, futures, currencies, securities, etc.Stocks, Bonds, Futures, FX, Metals, Options, CFDs and ETFs
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Portuguese, EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare IB and SwissDirekt against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: IB vs SwissDirekt

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IB or SwissDirekt?

IB holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 0). Specifically, IB maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, ASIC, MAS) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SwissDirekt maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IB and SwissDirekt?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IB records an Overall Score of 8.0 (Risk & Licensing: 8.0, Brand: 8.0, Market Influence: 8.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 6.0), compared with SwissDirekt at 1.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do IB and SwissDirekt differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

IB lists Stocks, options, futures, currencies, securities, etc. with execution software [MT4, MT5], while SwissDirekt lists Stocks, Bonds, Futures, FX, Metals, Options, CFDs and ETFs with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IB or SwissDirekt?

IB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SwissDirekt carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

IB vs SwissDirekt (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab