Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FUTU vs Sync Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) and Sync Markets (Sync Markets LTD.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

FUTU 6D Score
7.7
Sync Markets 6D Score
5.2
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: futu-vs-sync-markets

FUTU outranks Sync Markets by +2.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 5.2)

On supervisory breadth, FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Sync Markets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFUTUSync MarketsScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.75.2+2.5FUTU
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.74.2+3.5FUTU
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.03.0+2.0FUTU
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.55.2+2.3FUTU
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.94.2+3.7FUTU

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUTU vs Sync Markets

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FUTU vs Sync Markets
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FUTU and Sync Markets.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFUTUSync Markets
Primary Legal NameFutu Holding LimitedSync Markets LTD.
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressG/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE).L1, 256 Rundle St, Adelaide, SA 5000 / Fortgate Offshore Investment and Legal Services Ltd. Ground Floor, The Sotheby Building, Rodney Village, Rodney Bay, Gros-Islet, Saint Lucia / Flat 5, 4th Floor, 27 Penywern Road, SW5 9TT, London, United Kingdom /
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocksCryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT5
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishChinese, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FUTU and Sync Markets against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FUTU vs Sync Markets

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUTU or Sync Markets?

Both FUTU and Sync Markets hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FUTU maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Sync Markets maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUTU and Sync Markets?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUTU records an Overall Score of 7.7 (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with Sync Markets at 5.2 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 5.2, Market Influence: 4.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do FUTU and Sync Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Sync Markets lists Cryptocurrencies, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUTU or Sync Markets?

FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Sync Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FUTU vs Sync Markets (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab