Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FUTU vs StoneX One: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) and StoneX One (StoneX Financial Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

FUTU 6D Score
7.7
StoneX One 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 5
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: futu-vs-stonex-one

FUTU outranks StoneX One by +2.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas StoneX One holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFUTUStoneX OneScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.75.0+2.7FUTU
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.75.0+2.7FUTU
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.03.0+2.0FUTU
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.55.0+2.5FUTU
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.95.0+2.9FUTU

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUTU vs StoneX One

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FUTU vs StoneX One
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FUTU and StoneX One.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFUTUStoneX One
Primary Legal NameFutu Holding LimitedStoneX Financial Inc.
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressG/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE).230 S LaSalle St #10-500 Chicago, IL 60604
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocksIndices, Forex, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FUTU and StoneX One against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FUTU vs StoneX One

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUTU or StoneX One?

StoneX One holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 1). Specifically, FUTU maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas StoneX One maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Financial Conduct Authority, NFA, MAS) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUTU and StoneX One?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUTU records an Overall Score of 7.7 (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with StoneX One at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do FUTU and StoneX One differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while StoneX One lists Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUTU or StoneX One?

FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while StoneX One carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FUTU vs StoneX One (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab