Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FUTU vs ProfitCoinvest: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) and ProfitCoinvest (ProfitCoinvest) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

FUTU 6D Score
7.7
ProfitCoinvest 6D Score
1.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: futu-vs-profitcoinvest

FUTU outranks ProfitCoinvest by +6.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 1.0)

On supervisory breadth, FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas ProfitCoinvest holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFUTUProfitCoinvestScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.71.0+6.7FUTU
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.71.0+6.7FUTU
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.01.0+4.0FUTU
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.51.0+6.5FUTU
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.91.0+6.9FUTU

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUTU vs ProfitCoinvest

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FUTU vs ProfitCoinvest
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FUTU and ProfitCoinvest.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFUTUProfitCoinvest
Primary Legal NameFutu Holding LimitedProfitCoinvest
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressG/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE).GB
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocksCFDs on Gold, Silver, Stocks, Commodities, Oil, Indices, Cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, etc.)
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FUTU and ProfitCoinvest against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FUTU vs ProfitCoinvest

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUTU or ProfitCoinvest?

FUTU holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, FUTU maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas ProfitCoinvest maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUTU and ProfitCoinvest?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUTU records an Overall Score of 7.7 (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with ProfitCoinvest at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do FUTU and ProfitCoinvest differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while ProfitCoinvest lists CFDs on Gold, Silver, Stocks, Commodities, Oil, Indices, Cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, etc.) with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUTU or ProfitCoinvest?

FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while ProfitCoinvest carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FUTU vs ProfitCoinvest (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab