1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FUTU vs MX Global: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) and MX Global (MX Global) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers
- FUTU 6D Score
- 7.7
- MX Global 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FUTU outranks MX Global by +2.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MX Global holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FUTU | MX Global | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.7 | 5.0 | +2.7 | FUTU |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.7 | 5.0 | +2.7 | FUTU |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | FUTU |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.5 | 5.0 | +2.5 | FUTU |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.9 | 5.0 | +2.9 | FUTU |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUTU vs MX Global
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FUTU | MX Global |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Futu Holding Limited | MX Global |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | SC: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | G/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE). | Level 7, Tower N, Jalan Damansara, Empire City, PJU 8, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FUTU and MX Global against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FUTU vs MX Global
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUTU or MX Global?
Both FUTU and MX Global hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FUTU maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MX Global maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUTU and MX Global?
In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUTU records an Overall Score of 7.7 (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with MX Global at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do FUTU and MX Global differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MX Global lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUTU or MX Global?
FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MX Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.