1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FUTU vs Invast Global: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) and Invast Global (Invast Financial Services Pty Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers
- FUTU 6D Score
- 7.7
- Invast Global 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FUTU outranks Invast Global by +1.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 6.0)
On supervisory breadth, FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Invast Global holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FUTU | Invast Global | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.7 | 6.0 | +1.7 | FUTU |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.7 | 6.0 | +1.7 | FUTU |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | FUTU |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.5 | 6.0 | +1.5 | FUTU |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.9 | 6.0 | +1.9 | FUTU |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUTU vs Invast Global
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FUTU | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Futu Holding Limited | Invast Financial Services Pty Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | G/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE). | Level 27, Aurora Place, 88 Phillip Street, Sydney NSW 2000 KOYO BUILDING, 1-5-6, Higashi-Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan 103-0004 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks | single-stock and ETF synthetic products, stock-algorithm suite, FX and precious metals, indices and commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FUTU and Invast Global against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FUTU vs Invast Global
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUTU or Invast Global?
Both FUTU and Invast Global hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FUTU maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Invast Global maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUTU and Invast Global?
In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUTU records an Overall Score of 7.7 (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with Invast Global at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do FUTU and Invast Global differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Invast Global lists single-stock and ETF synthetic products, stock-algorithm suite, FX and precious metals, indices and commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUTU or Invast Global?
FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Invast Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.