1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FUTU vs Gildencrest Capital: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) and Gildencrest Capital (Gildencrest Capital) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers
- FUTU 6D Score
- 7.7
- Gildencrest Capital 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FUTU outranks Gildencrest Capital by +1.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 6.0)
On supervisory breadth, FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Gildencrest Capital holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FUTU | Gildencrest Capital | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.7 | 6.0 | +1.7 | FUTU |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.7 | 6.0 | +1.7 | FUTU |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | FUTU |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.5 | 6.0 | +1.5 | FUTU |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.9 | 6.0 | +1.9 | FUTU |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUTU vs Gildencrest Capital
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FUTU | Gildencrest Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Futu Holding Limited | Gildencrest Capital |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | G/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE). | Studio 11, 7th Floor, One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5AA UK |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks | Indices, Forex, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | Spanish, Portuguese, Arabic, Urdu, Chinese, English, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FUTU and Gildencrest Capital against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FUTU vs Gildencrest Capital
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUTU or Gildencrest Capital?
Both FUTU and Gildencrest Capital hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FUTU maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Gildencrest Capital maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUTU and Gildencrest Capital?
In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUTU records an Overall Score of 7.7 (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with Gildencrest Capital at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do FUTU and Gildencrest Capital differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Gildencrest Capital lists Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUTU or Gildencrest Capital?
FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Gildencrest Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.