Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

BOQ vs FUTU: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BOQ (Bank of Queensland Limited) and FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

BOQ 6D Score
7.0
FUTU 6D Score
7.7
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: boq-vs-futu

FUTU outranks BOQ by +0.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 7.0)

On supervisory breadth, BOQ holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightBOQFUTUScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.07.7+0.7FUTU
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.07.7+0.7FUTU
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.05.0+1.0FUTU
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.07.5+0.5FUTU
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.07.9+1.9FUTU

Visual Architecture Benchmark: BOQ vs FUTU

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: BOQ vs FUTU
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between BOQ and FUTU.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeBOQFUTU
Primary Legal NameBank of Queensland LimitedFutu Holding Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressFIONA LAWRENCE, 'Boq Village' Level 6, 100 Skyring Terrace NEWSTEAD QLD 4006G/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE).
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesLoans, credit cards, international and domestic trade financial services, etc.Stocks
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare BOQ and FUTU against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: BOQ vs FUTU

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BOQ or FUTU?

Both BOQ and FUTU hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, BOQ maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FUTU maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BOQ and FUTU?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BOQ records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with FUTU at 7.7 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).

How do BOQ and FUTU differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

BOQ lists Loans, credit cards, international and domestic trade financial services, etc. with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BOQ or FUTU?

BOQ carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

BOQ vs FUTU (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab