Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

BCM vs FUTU: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BCM (Basel Capital Markets) and FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

BCM 6D Score
2.0
FUTU 6D Score
7.7
Regulated Licences
0 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: bcm-4256-vs-futu

FUTU outranks BCM by +5.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, BCM holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightBCMFUTUScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite2.07.7+5.7FUTU
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight2.07.7+5.7FUTU
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight2.05.0+3.0FUTU
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight2.07.5+5.5FUTU
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight2.07.9+5.9FUTU

Visual Architecture Benchmark: BCM vs FUTU

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: BCM vs FUTU
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between BCM and FUTU.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeBCMFUTU
Primary Legal NameBasel Capital MarketsFutu Holding Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressZavos City Center, 4th Floor, 88 Agias Fylaxeos, 3025 Limassol, CyprusG/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE).
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCurrency pairs, Indices, Stocks, CommoditiesStocks
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare BCM and FUTU against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: BCM vs FUTU

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BCM or FUTU?

FUTU holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, BCM maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FUTU maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BCM and FUTU?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BCM records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with FUTU at 7.7 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).

How do BCM and FUTU differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

BCM lists Currency pairs, Indices, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BCM or FUTU?

BCM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

BCM vs FUTU (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab