Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

AGL vs shareDeal active: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of AGL (ABans Global Limited) and shareDeal active (shareDeal active) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

AGL 6D Score
5.0
shareDeal active 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: agl-vs-sharedeal-active

AGL and shareDeal active are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, AGL holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas shareDeal active holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightAGLshareDeal activeScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: AGL vs shareDeal active

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: AGL vs shareDeal active
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between AGL and shareDeal active.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeAGLshareDeal active
Primary Legal NameABans Global LimitedshareDeal active
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / Address3rd Floor, 19 Gerrard Street, W1D 6JG. London, UKshareDeal active Jarvis Investment Management Ltd 78 Mount Ephraim Royal Tunbridge Wells Kent TN4 8BS
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMulti-asset financial servicesStocks, Bonds and ETFs
Execution Software & TerminalsMT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare AGL and shareDeal active against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: AGL vs shareDeal active

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: AGL or shareDeal active?

AGL holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, AGL maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas shareDeal active maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between AGL and shareDeal active?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), AGL records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with shareDeal active at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do AGL and shareDeal active differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

AGL lists general financial services with execution software [MT5], while shareDeal active lists Stocks, Bonds and ETFs with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: AGL or shareDeal active?

AGL carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while shareDeal active carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

AGL vs shareDeal active (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab