Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

LHCM vs shareDeal active: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of LHCM (LHCM Ltd) and shareDeal active (shareDeal active) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

LHCM 6D Score
6.0
shareDeal active 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: lhcm-vs-sharedeal-active

LHCM outranks shareDeal active by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, LHCM holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas shareDeal active holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightLHCMshareDeal activeScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.05.0+1.0LHCM
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight3.05.0+2.0shareDeal active
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.03.0+1.0LHCM
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0LHCM
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0LHCM

Visual Architecture Benchmark: LHCM vs shareDeal active

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: LHCM vs shareDeal active
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between LHCM and shareDeal active.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeLHCMshareDeal active
Primary Legal NameLHCM LtdshareDeal active
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / Address8 Devonshire Square, London EC2M 4PLshareDeal active Jarvis Investment Management Ltd 78 Mount Ephraim Royal Tunbridge Wells Kent TN4 8BS
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocks, Futures, Options, Currencies, BondsStocks, Bonds and ETFs
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare LHCM and shareDeal active against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: LHCM vs shareDeal active

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: LHCM or shareDeal active?

LHCM holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, LHCM maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas shareDeal active maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between LHCM and shareDeal active?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), LHCM records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with shareDeal active at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do LHCM and shareDeal active differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

LHCM lists Stocks, Futures, Options, Currencies, Bonds with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while shareDeal active lists Stocks, Bonds and ETFs with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: LHCM or shareDeal active?

LHCM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while shareDeal active carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

LHCM vs shareDeal active (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab