Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

ICICIDirect vs U Trade: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of ICICIDirect (ICICIDirect) and U Trade (UOB Kay Hian) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

ICICIDirect 6D Score
6.3
U Trade 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: icicidirect-vs-u-trade

ICICIDirect outranks U Trade by +1.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.3 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, ICICIDirect holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas U Trade holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightICICIDirectU TradeScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.35.0+1.3ICICIDirect
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.35.0+1.3ICICIDirect
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.35.0+1.3ICICIDirect
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.35.0+1.3ICICIDirect

Visual Architecture Benchmark: ICICIDirect vs U Trade

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: ICICIDirect vs U Trade
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between ICICIDirect and U Trade.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeICICIDirectU Trade
Primary Legal NameICICIDirectUOB Kay Hian
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressCICI Venture House, Appasaheb Marathe Marg, Mumbai - 400025, India6/F Harcourt House, 39 Gloucester Road, Hong Kong
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStock trading, futures and options trading, investment funds, bonds, insurance, etc.Stocks, futures, options, bonds, exchange-traded funds, IPO subscriptions, mutual funds, margin financing
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare ICICIDirect and U Trade against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: ICICIDirect vs U Trade

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: ICICIDirect or U Trade?

Both ICICIDirect and U Trade hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, ICICIDirect maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SEBI) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas U Trade maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (SFC, SFC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between ICICIDirect and U Trade?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), ICICIDirect records an Overall Score of 6.3 (Risk & Licensing: 6.3, Brand: 6.3, Market Influence: 6.3, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with U Trade at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do ICICIDirect and U Trade differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

ICICIDirect lists Stock trading, futures and options trading, investment funds, bonds, insurance, etc. with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while U Trade lists Stocks, futures, options, bonds, exchange-traded funds, IPO subscriptions, mutual funds, margin financing with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: ICICIDirect or U Trade?

ICICIDirect carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while U Trade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

ICICIDirect vs U Trade (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab