Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FUTU vs Sheer Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) and Sheer Markets (Sheer Markets (Cyprus) Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

FUTU 6D Score
7.7
Sheer Markets 6D Score
6.5
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: futu-vs-sheer-markets

FUTU outranks Sheer Markets by +1.2 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 6.5)

On supervisory breadth, FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Sheer Markets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFUTUSheer MarketsScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.76.5+1.2FUTU
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.76.5+1.2FUTU
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.04.0+1.0FUTU
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.56.5+1.0FUTU
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.96.5+1.4FUTU

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUTU vs Sheer Markets

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FUTU vs Sheer Markets
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FUTU and Sheer Markets.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFUTUSheer Markets
Primary Legal NameFutu Holding LimitedSheer Markets (Cyprus) Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressG/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE).331, 28th October Avenue, Lido House Block 2, Unit 365, 3106, Limassol, Cyprus
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocksLiquid Cash NDF CFDs, FX and Emerging Markets FX CFDs, Cryptocurrency CFDs, Stocks, Indices and Commodities CFDs
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT5
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FUTU and Sheer Markets against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FUTU vs Sheer Markets

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUTU or Sheer Markets?

Both FUTU and Sheer Markets hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FUTU maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Sheer Markets maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUTU and Sheer Markets?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUTU records an Overall Score of 7.7 (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with Sheer Markets at 6.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.5, Brand: 6.5, Market Influence: 6.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do FUTU and Sheer Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Sheer Markets lists Liquid Cash NDF CFDs, FX and Emerging Markets FX CFDs, Cryptocurrency CFDs, Stocks, Indices and Commodities CFDs with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUTU or Sheer Markets?

FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Sheer Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FUTU vs Sheer Markets (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab