1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FUTU vs JM Financial: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) and JM Financial (JM Financial) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers
- FUTU 6D Score
- 7.7
- JM Financial 6D Score
- 3.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FUTU outranks JM Financial by +4.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas JM Financial holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FUTU | JM Financial | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.7 | 3.0 | +4.7 | FUTU |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.7 | 3.0 | +4.7 | FUTU |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | FUTU |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.5 | 3.0 | +4.5 | FUTU |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.9 | 3.0 | +4.9 | FUTU |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUTU vs JM Financial
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FUTU | JM Financial |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Futu Holding Limited | JM Financial |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | G/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE). | JM Financial Limited, 7th Floor, Cnergy, Appasaheb Marathe Marg, Prabhadevi, Mumbai 400025 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks | Investment management, Financial services, Wealth management, Asset management, Stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FUTU and JM Financial against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FUTU vs JM Financial
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUTU or JM Financial?
FUTU holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, FUTU maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas JM Financial maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUTU and JM Financial?
In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUTU records an Overall Score of 7.7 (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with JM Financial at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do FUTU and JM Financial differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while JM Financial lists Investment management, Financial services, Wealth management, Asset management, Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUTU or JM Financial?
FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while JM Financial carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.