1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Bourse Direct vs CapitalXtend: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Bourse Direct (Bourse Direct) and CapitalXtend (CapitalXtend) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers
- Bourse Direct 6D Score
- 5.0
- CapitalXtend 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Bourse Direct and CapitalXtend are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Bourse Direct holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CapitalXtend holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Bourse Direct | CapitalXtend | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | CapitalXtend |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | CapitalXtend |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | CapitalXtend |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Bourse Direct vs CapitalXtend
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Bourse Direct | CapitalXtend |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Bourse Direct | CapitalXtend |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 374 Rue Saint-Honoré, Paris 75001 | Suite 201 The Catalyst 40 Silicon Avenue Cybercity, 72201 Eben, Republic of Mauritius |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks, UCITS, Warrants, CFDs and FX | CFDs on Forex, Stocks, Indices, Spot Metals and Spot Energy |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English, French | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Bourse Direct and CapitalXtend against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Bourse Direct vs CapitalXtend
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Bourse Direct or CapitalXtend?
CapitalXtend holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Bourse Direct maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CapitalXtend maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Bourse Direct and CapitalXtend?
In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Bourse Direct records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with CapitalXtend at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Bourse Direct and CapitalXtend differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Bourse Direct lists Stocks, UCITS, Warrants, CFDs and FX with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while CapitalXtend lists CFDs on Forex, Stocks, Indices, Spot Metals and Spot Energy with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Bourse Direct or CapitalXtend?
Bourse Direct carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CapitalXtend carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.