Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

Institution record

Angel One

Risk level not supplied1 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
7.0
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
In our coverage
Securities and Exchange Board of India
INZ000161534RegulatedANGEL ONE LIMITED1990-01-13

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Angel One against peer institutions in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Angel One (this record)
SEBI
1 / 1Risk level not supplied7.00
SEBI
1 / 1Risk level not supplied7.00
SEBI
1 / 1Risk level not supplied6.10
SEBI
1 / 1Risk level not supplied6.00
SEBI
1 / 1Risk level not supplied6.00
SEBI
1 / 1Risk level not supplied6.00

Angel One: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Angel One's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Angel One (legal entity reference: Angel One) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) — licence INZ000161534, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official SEBI public register.

Which of Angel One's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

This directory focuses on stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers. 1 of Angel One's 1 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: SEBI (licence INZ000161534, regulated, entity: ANGEL ONE LIMITED). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.

What is Angel One's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Angel One carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 7.0, risk & licensing: 6.0, brand: 7.0, market influence: 6.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Angel One's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Angel One (listed execution software: Angel One: Stocks, Mutual Fund), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SEBI.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from ETFYield Lab relevant to Angel One's supervisory scope.

All research →

Fixed Income ETFs & Market Microstructure

SEC Rule 6c-11 Custom Creation Baskets, Fixed-Income ETF NAV Arbitrage & After-Tax Yield Drag Model (2026)

Authorized Participant (AP) custom creation and redemption baskets under SEC Rule 6c-11 refer to non-pro-rata fixed-income portfolio transfers that allow ETF issuers to purge low-basis, illiquid, or off-the-run bonds in-kind without realizing distributable capital gains, compressing annualized after-tax yield drag by 42 to 118 basis points compared with open-end mutual funds.

Read briefing →

Corporate & Municipal Bond ETFs

Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) vs. Direct T-Bill Tax Math: Modified Duration, DV01 & +/-100 bps Parallel Yield Shock Table (4.32% Implied Box Spread Rate Benchmark)

Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) vs. Direct T-Bill Tax Math (BOXX-SYNTHETIC-BOX) stands at 4.32% (Implied Box Spread Rate) (Source: Cboe SPX Box Options / IRS Sec 1256, 2026-10-20), governing second-order Taylor

Read briefing →

Corporate & Municipal Bond ETFs

Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) vs. Direct T-Bill Tax Math: CPI-U Index Ratio Accretion & Real Purchasing-Power Attribution (4.32% Implied Box Spread Rate Benchmark)

Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) vs. Direct T-Bill Tax Math (BOXX-SYNTHETIC-BOX) stands at 4.32% (Implied Box Spread Rate) (Source: Cboe SPX Box Options / IRS Sec 1256, 2026-10-20), governing 3-month Reference CP

Read briefing →

etf-and-yield

Spot BTC & ETH ETF Authorized Participant Flows and DeFi Lending Yields After the $6.3B Exchange Breach

Evaluating how institutional allocators rotated between spot BTC/ETH ETFs and on-chain lending pools as the $6.3 billion Binance attacker swapped freezable stablecoins on Aave.

Read briefing →
Angel One — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | ETFYield Lab