Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Success vs U Trade: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Success (Success Finance Group) and U Trade (UOB Kay Hian) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

Success 6D Score
7.0
U Trade 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: success-vs-u-trade

Success outranks U Trade by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Success holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas U Trade holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightSuccessU TradeScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.05.0+2.0Success
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.05.0+2.0Success
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.03.0+1.0Success
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.05.0+2.0Success
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.05.0+2.0Success

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Success vs U Trade

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Success vs U Trade
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Success and U Trade.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeSuccessU Trade
Primary Legal NameSuccess Finance GroupUOB Kay Hian
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressHong Kong Harcourt Road 18 Admiralty Centre 1 Tower 10/F Room 1003-046/F Harcourt House, 39 Gloucester Road, Hong Kong
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesPrecious metals, StocksStocks, futures, options, bonds, exchange-traded funds, IPO subscriptions, mutual funds, margin financing
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Success and U Trade against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Success vs U Trade

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Success or U Trade?

Both Success and U Trade hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Success maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas U Trade maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (SFC, SFC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Success and U Trade?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Success records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with U Trade at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Success and U Trade differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Success lists Precious metals, Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while U Trade lists Stocks, futures, options, bonds, exchange-traded funds, IPO subscriptions, mutual funds, margin financing with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Success or U Trade?

Success carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while U Trade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Success vs U Trade (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab