Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

IB vs Naito Securities: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IB (Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Limited) and Naito Securities (NAITO Securities Co., Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

IB 6D Score
8.0
Naito Securities 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
5 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: ib-vs-naito

IB outranks Naito Securities by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (8.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, IB holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Naito Securities holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightIBNaito SecuritiesScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite8.05.0+3.0IB
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight8.05.0+3.0IB
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight6.04.0+2.0IB
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight8.05.0+3.0IB
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight8.06.0+2.0IB

Visual Architecture Benchmark: IB vs Naito Securities

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: IB vs Naito Securities
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between IB and Naito Securities.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeIBNaito Securities
Primary Legal NameInteractive Brokers Hong Kong LimitedNAITO Securities Co., Ltd.
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressOne Pickwick Plaza, Greenwich, CT 06830 USAPostal code 530-6119 Nakanoshimadai Building 19th Floor, 3-3-23 Nakanoshima, Kita-ku, Osaka City
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocks, options, futures, currencies, securities, etc.Stocks, bonds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and real estate investment trusts (REITs)
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Portuguese, EnglishEnglish, Japanese
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare IB and Naito Securities against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: IB vs Naito Securities

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IB or Naito Securities?

IB holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 1). Specifically, IB maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, ASIC, MAS) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Naito Securities maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FSA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IB and Naito Securities?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IB records an Overall Score of 8.0 (Risk & Licensing: 8.0, Brand: 8.0, Market Influence: 8.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 6.0), compared with Naito Securities at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do IB and Naito Securities differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

IB lists Stocks, options, futures, currencies, securities, etc. with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Naito Securities lists Stocks, bonds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and real estate investment trusts (REITs) with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IB or Naito Securities?

IB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Naito Securities carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

IB vs Naito Securities (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab