Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FUTU vs HAMILTON: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) and HAMILTON (HAMILTON INVESTMENTS GROUP LTD.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

FUTU 6D Score
7.7
HAMILTON 6D Score
2.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: futu-vs-hamilton

FUTU outranks HAMILTON by +5.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas HAMILTON holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFUTUHAMILTONScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.72.0+5.7FUTU
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.72.0+5.7FUTU
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.01.0+4.0FUTU
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.52.0+5.5FUTU
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.92.0+5.9FUTU

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUTU vs HAMILTON

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FUTU vs HAMILTON
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FUTU and HAMILTON.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFUTUHAMILTON
Primary Legal NameFutu Holding LimitedHAMILTON INVESTMENTS GROUP LTD.
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressG/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE).First Floor, First St. Vincent Bank Building, James Street, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocksCurrency pairs, Indices, Stocks, Metals, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishChinese, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FUTU and HAMILTON against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FUTU vs HAMILTON

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUTU or HAMILTON?

FUTU holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, FUTU maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas HAMILTON maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUTU and HAMILTON?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUTU records an Overall Score of 7.7 (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with HAMILTON at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do FUTU and HAMILTON differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while HAMILTON lists Currency pairs, Indices, Stocks, Metals, Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUTU or HAMILTON?

FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while HAMILTON carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FUTU vs HAMILTON (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab