Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FUTU vs FXlift: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) and FXlift (FXlift) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

FUTU 6D Score
7.7
FXlift 6D Score
6.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: futu-vs-fxlift

FUTU outranks FXlift by +1.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FXlift holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFUTUFXliftScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.76.0+1.7FUTU
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.75.0+2.7FUTU
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.03.0+2.0FUTU
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.56.0+1.5FUTU
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.95.0+2.9FUTU

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUTU vs FXlift

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FUTU vs FXlift
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FUTU and FXlift.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFUTUFXlift
Primary Legal NameFutu Holding LimitedFXlift
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressG/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE).2 Iapetou Street, Agios Athanasios, 4101 Limassol, Cyprus
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocksStocks, foreign exchange, metals, spot indices, commodities, futures contracts
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FUTU and FXlift against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FUTU vs FXlift

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUTU or FXlift?

Both FUTU and FXlift hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FUTU maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FXlift maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUTU and FXlift?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUTU records an Overall Score of 7.7 (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with FXlift at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do FUTU and FXlift differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while FXlift lists Stocks, foreign exchange, metals, spot indices, commodities, futures contracts with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUTU or FXlift?

FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FXlift carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FUTU vs FXlift (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab