Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Freetrade vs whitebit: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Freetrade (Freetrade Limited) and whitebit (whitebit) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

Freetrade 6D Score
7.0
whitebit 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 5
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: freetrade-vs-whitebit

Freetrade outranks whitebit by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Freetrade holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas whitebit holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFreetradewhitebitScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.05.0+2.0Freetrade
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.05.0+2.0Freetrade
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.05.0+2.0Freetrade
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.05.0+2.0Freetrade

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Freetrade vs whitebit

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Freetrade vs whitebit
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Freetrade and whitebit.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFreetradewhitebit
Primary Legal NameFreetrade Limitedwhitebit
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register): #FVT000351Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS): Not suppliedCNB: Not suppliedPolish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF): Not suppliedBulgarian National Bank (BNB): Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressFreetrade Limited 32-38 Leman Street London E1 8EW United KingdomJ. Basanavičiaus g. 26, Vilnius, LT-03224, Lithuania
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocksCrypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesSwedish, EnglishOther languages, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Freetrade and whitebit against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Freetrade vs whitebit

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Freetrade or whitebit?

whitebit holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 1). Specifically, Freetrade maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas whitebit maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register), Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS), CNB, Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Freetrade and whitebit?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Freetrade records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with whitebit at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Freetrade and whitebit differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Freetrade lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while whitebit lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Freetrade or whitebit?

Freetrade carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while whitebit carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Freetrade vs whitebit (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab