1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
DA Internationa vs UPbit: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of DA Internationa ((DA International Financial Service Ltd)) and UPbit (UPbit) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers
- DA Internationa 6D Score
- 7.0
- UPbit 6D Score
- 5.6
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
DA Internationa outranks UPbit by +1.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.6)
On supervisory breadth, DA Internationa holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas UPbit holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | DA Internationa | UPbit | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.0 | 5.6 | +1.4 | DA Internationa |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.0 | 5.4 | +1.6 | DA Internationa |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | DA Internationa |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.3 | +0.7 | DA Internationa |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.5 | +0.5 | DA Internationa |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: DA Internationa vs UPbit
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | DA Internationa | UPbit |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | (DA International Financial Service Ltd) | UPbit |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | MAS: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Hong Kong Wan Chai Harbour Road 6-8 Shui On Centre 32/F Room 11-18 | South Korea Seoul |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Stocks, Futures | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | upbit IOS, upbit Android |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | Chinese, English, Korean, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare DA Internationa and UPbit against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: DA Internationa vs UPbit
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: DA Internationa or UPbit?
Both DA Internationa and UPbit hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, DA Internationa maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas UPbit maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (MAS) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between DA Internationa and UPbit?
In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), DA Internationa records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with UPbit at 5.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.4, Brand: 5.3, Market Influence: 5.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do DA Internationa and UPbit differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
DA Internationa lists Stocks, Futures with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while UPbit lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [upbit IOS, upbit Android]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: DA Internationa or UPbit?
DA Internationa carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while UPbit carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.