Skip to content
ETFYield Lab
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Binany Global vs IB: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Binany Global (Binany Global) and IB (Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers

Binany Global 6D Score
5.0
IB 6D Score
8.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 5
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: binany-global-vs-ib

IB outranks Binany Global by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (8.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Binany Global holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas IB holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightBinany GlobalIBScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.08.0+3.0IB
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.08.0+3.0IB
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.06.0+3.0IB
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.08.0+3.0IB
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.08.0+3.0IB

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Binany Global vs IB

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Binany Global vs IB
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Binany Global and IB.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeBinany GlobalIB
Primary Legal NameBinany GlobalInteractive Brokers Hong Kong Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressCalista Group Ltd, 215581, Suite 1, Francis Rachel Str., Mahe, Victoria, SeychellesOne Pickwick Plaza, Greenwich, CT 06830 USA
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocks, Forex and CryptoassetsStocks, options, futures, currencies, securities, etc.
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesOther languages, Arabic, Hindi, Chinese, English, RussianChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Portuguese, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Binany Global and IB against other regulated peers in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Binany Global vs IB

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Binany Global or IB?

IB holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 0). Specifically, Binany Global maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas IB maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (IIROC, Financial Conduct Authority, ASIC, MAS) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Binany Global and IB?

In ETFYield Lab's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Binany Global records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with IB at 8.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 8.0, Brand: 8.0, Market Influence: 8.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 6.0).

How do Binany Global and IB differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Binany Global lists Stocks, Forex and Cryptoassets with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while IB lists Stocks, options, futures, currencies, securities, etc. with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Binany Global or IB?

Binany Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while IB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Binany Global vs IB (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | ETFYield Lab