Skip to content
ETFYield Lab

Institution record

OKX

Risk level not supplied9 of 9 licences marked regulated
Source score
β€”
Warnings
1
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
FSAOffshore
Financial Services Authority Seychelles
Number pending checkRegulatedAux Cayes Fintech Co Ltdβ€”
MASTier-1
Monetary Authority of Singapore
Number pending checkRegulatedOKX SG PTE. LTD.β€”
VARATier-2
Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority
VL/23/12/003RegulatedOKX Middle East Fintech FZE2024/09/17
SECTier-3
Securities and Exchange Commission
Number pending checkRegulatedOkcoin Philippines Technology Co. Ltd.β€”
SECTier-1
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
1767779RegulatedOKCoin USA Inc2018-12-05
AUSTRACTier-1
Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre
22636269040RegulatedOKX AUSTRALIA PTY LTD2019-11-04
AMFTier-1
AutoritΓ© des marchΓ©s financiers
E2023-106RegulatedOKX France Technology company Limited2023-12-12
MFSATier-2
Malta Financial Services Authority
C95813RegulatedOKX EUROPE MARKETS LIMITED2020-11-06
FinCENTier-1
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)
31000293015755RegulatedOKX Global Digital Exchange Ltd2025-02-17

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing OKX against peer institutions in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers dataset.

Full directory β†’
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
OKX (this record)
FSAMASVARA+6
9 / 9Risk level not suppliedβ€”1
Robinhood
FINRASECSEC+6
9 / 9Risk level not suppliedβ€”0
Doo Prime
FCAFINRASEC+4
7 / 7Risk level not suppliedβ€”1
Swissquote
FCASFCCYSEC+3
5 / 6Risk level not suppliedβ€”0
EC Markets
FMAFCAASIC+2
3 / 5Risk level not suppliedβ€”0
IB
IIROCFCAASIC+2
5 / 5Risk level not suppliedβ€”0

OKX: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is OKX's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, OKX (legal entity reference: OKX) holds 9 recorded licence entries, of which 9 carry a "regulated" status and 9 are marked regulated or registered: FSA (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) β€” licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Offshore; MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) β€” licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1; VARA (Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority) β€” licence VL/23/12/003, status: regulated, Tier-2; SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) β€” licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-3; SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission) β€” licence 1767779, status: regulated, Tier-1; AUSTRAC (Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre) β€” licence 22636269040, status: regulated, Tier-1; AMF (AutoritΓ© des marchΓ©s financiers) β€” licence E2023-106, status: regulated, Tier-1; MFSA (Malta Financial Services Authority) β€” licence C95813, status: regulated, Tier-2; FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)) β€” licence 31000293015755, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FSA, MAS, VARA public register.

Which of OKX's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

OKX is tracked under our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 9 recorded licences (FSA, MAS, VARA, SEC, AUSTRAC, AMF, MFSA, FinCEN) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is OKX's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

OKX carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 1 regulatory warning or complaint count. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to OKX's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with OKX (listed execution software: OKX), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 1 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FSA.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from ETFYield Lab relevant to OKX's supervisory scope.

All research β†’

Treasury Ladders & Yield Math

iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark: 30-Day SEC Yield vs. Trailing 12-Month Distribution Yield Audit (4.31% 30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER) Benchmark)

iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark (SGOV-0-3M-UST) stands at 4.31% (30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER)) (Source: SEC Form N-1A / U.S. Treasury, 2026-10-20), governing Form N-1A Item 26 accrual acco

Read briefing β†’

Treasury Ladders & Yield Math

iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark: Rolling Rung Ladder vs. T-Bill + Long-Bond Barbell Strategy (4.31% 30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER) Benchmark)

iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark (SGOV-0-3M-UST) stands at 4.31% (30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER)) (Source: SEC Form N-1A / U.S. Treasury, 2026-10-20), governing reinvestment risk immunization

Read briefing β†’

TIPS & Inflation Breakevens

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) Liquidity & Fee Audit: 30-Day SEC Yield vs. Trailing 12-Month Distribution Yield Audit (4.20% 30-Day SEC Yield (13.56 bps ER) Benchmark)

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) Liquidity & Fee Audit (BIL-1-3M-TBILL) stands at 4.20% (30-Day SEC Yield (13.56 bps ER)) (Source: SEC EDGAR / State Street, 2026-10-20), governing Form N-1A Item 26 accrual accou

Read briefing β†’

ETF Fee Drag & SEC Yield Audits

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) Liquidity & Fee Audit: 10-Year Expense Ratio Fee Drag & Compounding Simulation ($100k) (4.20% 30-Day SEC Yield (13.56 bps ER) Benchmark)

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) Liquidity & Fee Audit (BIL-1-3M-TBILL) stands at 4.20% (30-Day SEC Yield (13.56 bps ER)) (Source: SEC EDGAR / State Street, 2026-10-20), governing basis-point fee differentials,

Read briefing β†’
OKX β€” Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | ETFYield Lab