Institution record
Gate.io
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMCCTier-2 Dubai Multi Commodities Centre | Number pending check | Regulated | GATE MENA DMCC | — | |
GFSCTier-2 Gibraltar Financial Services Commission | 121003 | Regulated | Hippo Capital Co Limited | 2021-09-04 | |
MFSATier-2 Malta Financial Services Authority | C 89337 | Regulated | GATE TECHNOLOGY LTD | 2018-11-12 | |
OAMTier-3 Organismo Agenti e Mediatori | PSV83 | Regulated | Gate Italy S.R.L | 2022-12-22 | |
ASICTier-1 Australian Securities and Investments Commission | 659 401 617 | Regulated | GATE INFORMATION PTY LTD | 2022-05-13 | |
OAMTier-3 Organismo Agenti e Mediatori | Gate Technology Italia SRL,Gate.MT | Regulated | Gate Technology Italia SRL,Gate.MT | 2024-02-27 | |
CRTier-3 Companies Registry（Registrar of Companies, HKSAR） | TC008572 | Regulated | Hippo Financial Services Limited | — | |
SECRTier-3 State Enterprise Centre of Registers | 306068986 | Regulated | Gate Global UAB | 2022-05-12 | |
SCBOffshore Securities Commission of The Bahamas | Number pending check | Regulated | GATE GLOBAL LIMITED | 2025-02-28 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Gate.io against peer institutions in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gate.io (this record) | DMCCGFSCMFSA+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Robinhood | FINRASECSEC+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Doo Prime | FCAFINRASEC+4 | 7 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 1 |
| EC Markets | FMAFCAASIC+2 | 3 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| IB | IIROCFCAASIC+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Tiger Brokers | SFCFINRAASIC+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
Gate.io: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Gate.io's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Gate.io (legal entity reference: Gate.io) holds 9 recorded licence entries, of which 9 carry a "regulated" status and 9 are marked regulated or registered: DMCC (Dubai Multi Commodities Centre) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-2; GFSC (Gibraltar Financial Services Commission) — licence 121003, status: regulated, Tier-2; MFSA (Malta Financial Services Authority) — licence C 89337, status: regulated, Tier-2; OAM (Organismo Agenti e Mediatori) — licence PSV83, status: regulated, Tier-3; ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 659 401 617, status: regulated, Tier-1; OAM (Organismo Agenti e Mediatori) — licence Gate Technology Italia SRL,Gate.MT, status: regulated, Tier-3; CR (Companies Registry（Registrar of Companies, HKSAR）) — licence TC008572, status: regulated, Tier-3; SECR (State Enterprise Centre of Registers) — licence 306068986, status: regulated, Tier-3; SCB (Securities Commission of The Bahamas) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Offshore. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official DMCC, GFSC, MFSA public register.
Which of Gate.io's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Gate.io is tracked under our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 9 recorded licences (DMCC, GFSC, MFSA, OAM, ASIC, CR, SECR, SCB) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Gate.io's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Gate.io carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Gate.io's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Gate.io (listed execution software: Gate.io:Trade BTC & ETH), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (gate.it) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to DMCC.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from ETFYield Lab relevant to Gate.io's supervisory scope.
ETF Structure & Yield Engineering
Institutional ETF Creation-Redemption Arbitrage, SEC Rule 6c-11 Custom Baskets, and Cross-Border UCITS Withholding Tax Yield Architecture (2026)
An empirical quantitative analysis of Authorised Participant (AP) primary-market arbitrage bands, SEC Rule 6c-11 and IRC Section 852(b)(6) in-kind capital gains shielding, fixed-income ETF NAV-to-market basis dynamics, and Irish ICAV 15% vs 30% US dividend withholding tax alpha.
Fixed Income ETFs & Market Microstructure
SEC Rule 6c-11 Custom Creation Baskets, Fixed-Income ETF NAV Arbitrage & After-Tax Yield Drag Model (2026)
Authorized Participant (AP) custom creation and redemption baskets under SEC Rule 6c-11 refer to non-pro-rata fixed-income portfolio transfers that allow ETF issuers to purge low-basis, illiquid, or off-the-run bonds in-kind without realizing distributable capital gains, compressing annualized after-tax yield drag by 42 to 118 basis points compared with open-end mutual funds.
Treasury Ladders & Yield Math
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark: 30-Day SEC Yield vs. Trailing 12-Month Distribution Yield Audit (4.31% 30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER) Benchmark)
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark (SGOV-0-3M-UST) stands at 4.31% (30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER)) (Source: SEC Form N-1A / U.S. Treasury, 2026-10-20), governing Form N-1A Item 26 accrual acco
TIPS & Inflation Breakevens
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark: Authorized Participant (AP) Creation/Redemption & NAV Premium/Discount (4.31% 30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER) Benchmark)
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark (SGOV-0-3M-UST) stands at 4.31% (30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER)) (Source: SEC Form N-1A / U.S. Treasury, 2026-10-20), governing custom baskets, Rule 6c-11 arb