Skip to content
ETFYield Lab

Institution record

Naqdi

Naqdi Group (PTY) LTD

Risk level not supplied0 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
FSCATier-2
Financial Sector Conduct Authority
51598Suspected cloneNaqdi Group (PTY) LTD2021-10-06

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Naqdi against peer institutions in our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Naqdi (this record)
FSCA
0 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
Investec
FCAFSCA
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
Klips
CYSECFSCA
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
Absa Group
FSCASARB
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
Bidvestbank
FSCASARB
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
Discovery Bank
FSCASARB
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0

Naqdi: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Naqdi's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Naqdi (legal entity reference: Naqdi Group (PTY) LTD) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 0 carry a "regulated" status and 0 are marked regulated or registered: FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) — licence 51598, status: suspected clone, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FSCA public register.

Which of Naqdi's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

Naqdi is registered at 106, 4t Floor, TBE 96 Rivonia Road Sandton Johannesburg 2191 and tracked under our stock brokers, investment platforms and wealth managers scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (FSCA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is Naqdi's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Naqdi carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts and 1 licence record with elevated status flags (FSCA: suspected clone). Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Naqdi's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Naqdi, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FSCA.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from ETFYield Lab relevant to Naqdi's supervisory scope.

All research →

ETF Structure & Yield Engineering

Institutional ETF Creation-Redemption Arbitrage, SEC Rule 6c-11 Custom Baskets, and Cross-Border UCITS Withholding Tax Yield Architecture (2026)

An empirical quantitative analysis of Authorised Participant (AP) primary-market arbitrage bands, SEC Rule 6c-11 and IRC Section 852(b)(6) in-kind capital gains shielding, fixed-income ETF NAV-to-market basis dynamics, and Irish ICAV 15% vs 30% US dividend withholding tax alpha.

Read briefing →

Fixed Income ETFs & Market Microstructure

SEC Rule 6c-11 Custom Creation Baskets, Fixed-Income ETF NAV Arbitrage & After-Tax Yield Drag Model (2026)

Authorized Participant (AP) custom creation and redemption baskets under SEC Rule 6c-11 refer to non-pro-rata fixed-income portfolio transfers that allow ETF issuers to purge low-basis, illiquid, or off-the-run bonds in-kind without realizing distributable capital gains, compressing annualized after-tax yield drag by 42 to 118 basis points compared with open-end mutual funds.

Read briefing →

Treasury Ladders & Yield Math

SGOV vs BIL vs TLT: 30-Day SEC Yield vs Distribution Yield Math & ETF Fee Drag Analysis (2026)

30-Day SEC Yield refers to a standardized net annualized yield metric mandated by the SEC that deducts fund expense ratios from 30-day portfolio income.

Read briefing →

Treasury Ladders & Yield Math

iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark: 30-Day SEC Yield vs. Trailing 12-Month Distribution Yield Audit (4.31% 30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER) Benchmark)

iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) Yield & Fee Benchmark (SGOV-0-3M-UST) stands at 4.31% (30-Day SEC Yield (3 bps ER)) (Source: SEC Form N-1A / U.S. Treasury, 2026-10-20), governing Form N-1A Item 26 accrual acco

Read briefing →
Naqdi — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | ETFYield Lab